Nowadays children prefer electronic games to other games and toys? Why is it happening? Is it a positive or negative development?
The importance of traditional games and toys, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of electronic games in replacing traditional games has sparked controversy over the potential impact of this trend in recent years. It can be agreed that electronic games have completely dominated the leisure time of children. This essay will elaborate on how electronic games benefit the children and how traditional games help children and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are many reasons why electronic games become popular among children, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that electronic games are not in isolation, and its popularity has been gaining since the beginning of the 21st century. It is believed that it plays an integral part in enhancing the cognitive skills of children. As an illustration, some range of games helps children improve their aptitude and intelligence level. Thus, electronic games play a vital part in children’s life.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that electronic games lack the fitness feature of children. As a result, children may become obese. Secondly, all parents may not be able to afford them as they are expensive. Therefore, children become eyesore by playing games excessively.
To conclude, I second my outlook on benefiting from electronic games which can lead to a good experience for the children unless it does have a limit. I believe that we should create awareness among children about the significance of all types of games.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33984375 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95075756626 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9429804948 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6428571429 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344445661292 0.242375264174 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132296391243 0.0925447433944 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709452841411 0.071462118173 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218040196041 0.151781067708 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637930380052 0.0609392437508 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.