Nowadays many countries have very cosmopolitan cities with people from all over the world. How can the government ensure that all these people can live together harmoniously?
There is a continuous trend of migrating people from one country to another for the better education or better job prospects or better lifestyle. Consequently, cities amongst the world have become more and more cosmopolitan which has raised the voice that whether the people would live harmoniously or not and what the government' role to maintain harmony within these cities.
At the outset, people in such cosmopolitan cities will have different cultural and spiritual believes which would be the cause for quarrelsome and atrocity among the people. Moreover, norms, values, taboos and traditions of one society do not match with another dwelling at the same cities, hence there will be bitterness and negative thoughts to each other. Consequently, the society would not be harmonious.
Nevertheless, people nowadays are highly educated and civilized. Therefore, even they are from the different background they tend to learn, appreciate, experience and assimilate others culture and traditions. In addition, they tend to celebrate each other's festivals together. For example, people living in Melbourne celebrate Chinese new year, Holi festival, Deepawali and many more together with great excitement and enthusiasm.
Last but not the least, the government in such cities must be vigilant and consistently monitoring the people activities particularly those from the high-risk countries. Also, the government could introduce stringent laws for those who behave irresponsibly and shows anti-social behavior.
To put into a nutshell, people within cosmopolitan cities could live harmoniously if they intend to absorb and acclimatize to other's culture with excitement. However, the government cannot stay aside blindfolded to intervene with the laws in place to protect people in such cities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 8.36945812808 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 20.9802955665 38% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71375464684 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94651821125 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583643122677 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6923076923 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.230769231 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278347212853 0.242375264174 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916269048598 0.0925447433944 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713942181326 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150660111164 0.151781067708 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607650239857 0.0609392437508 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.