Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss
Recently, the phenomenon of spending too much time at work and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of spending some time with the family is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that experiencing time shortage cannot be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, balancing the private and personal life can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that no time shortage, as well as some personal hobbies, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered having fun with family members. Thus, beneficial ramifications of part-time jobs and social activities apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of social issues, unbalanced private and professional life might increase the consequences of dissatisfaction. Moreover, fundamental aspects of having less time relate to this reality that the demerits of no productivity pertain to depression. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of having too much working hours is correlated negatively with no planning for leisure time. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of balancing work and personal life far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of saving some free time prove the significance of any full-time job, but also pinpoint the family’s satisfaction implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57553956835 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22943061389 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640287769784 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3186065766 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.166666667 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293503250829 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967018401357 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717701150383 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169029433517 0.151781067708 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381042257725 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.