Nowadays TV has become an essential part of life, and a bridge to spread news and awareness and for some it acts like a companion. What is your opinion about this?
Recently, the phenomenon of television which causes many effects on human's life, raising awareness, and as a companion and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate,. Although contested by many that the matter of disseminating data is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that making entertainments can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, TV which provide human with substantial entertainment and news can provide the society with some noticeable effects that merits increasing people's knowledge, as well as spending one's time positively, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered acting as a friend. Hence, beneficial ramifications of being aware of important news apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, TV which exerts an pernicious influence on human might increase consequences of sedentary lifestyle. Moreover, fundamental aspects of decreasing social interaction would relate to this reality that demerits of being solitary pertain to watching one's time. As a tangible example, some academic research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that downside of losing family reunion is correlated negatively with misguiding. Thus, it is correct to presume preconceived notion of adverse effect on human's life.
To conclude,while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that merits of TV which makes one's life blissfully happy outweigh its demerits. Thus, the positive aspects of television should be considered.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...television which causes many effects on humans life, raising awareness, and as a compa...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...nding impact has sparked a heated debate,. Although contested by many that the mat...
^^
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... peoples knowledge, as well as spending ones time positively, are inextricably bound...
^^^^
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...n the realm of science, TV which exerts an pernicious influence on human might inc...
^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s of being solitary pertain to watching ones time. As a tangible example, some acade...
^^^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...university has asserted that downside of losing family reunion is correlated nega...
^^
Line 3, column 538, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...reconceived notion of adverse effect on humans life. To conclude,while there are comp...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , while
...erse effect on humans life. To conclude,while there are compelling arguments on both ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 116, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...y believe that merits of TV which makes ones life blissfully happy outweigh its deme...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70769230769 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25111724083 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646153846154 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0007489052 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.666666667 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.33497536946 169% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121362336617 0.242375264174 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398029162312 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0219705230428 0.071462118173 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0688690025698 0.151781067708 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237531152805 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.05 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.