In order to study effectively, it requires comfort, peace and time. So it is impossible for a student to combine learning and employment at the same time, because one distracts the other. Do you think this statement is realistic in today’s life?
In this current world context, most of the people do their higher studies simultaneously with their employment. While some people claim it is not realistic to study during employment, on my point of view people have to manage both student life and employment irrespective of the external factors.
Firstly, we can see lucrative amount of advantages of being employed while studying because these people are able to experience the validity of the theories they study, in common practice. For example, they can produce more effective answers in examinations with practical scenarios together with currents technological advancements. In addition, they can use their income for further studies as well.
On the other hand, some people do have problems in managing their studies along with the employment. For instance, some students need more time to absorb knowledge and they need further study to instill theories inside their mind. However, some students need calm and quite environment to study which is not available with a working students. Therefore, the effectiveness and efficiency of studying while employment depends on individuals personality and preference.
In conclusion, it is recommended to do a job while studying because it is prudent to enter into the job market early as possible, since experience matters a lot in climbing up the career ladder. In nutshell, they can fulfill their social requirements with the remuneration such as building a house, buying a car etc. It is also beleived, that governments have to open up the education market to private sector to increase the opportunities to the younger generation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'student'?
Suggestion: student
...y which is not available with a working students. Therefore, the effectiveness and effic...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 428, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...of studying while employment depends on individuals personality and preference. In concl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37596899225 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99158776906 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9063190916 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.583333333 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5833333333 7.25397266985 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153450465904 0.242375264174 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586993395775 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310469565504 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937547773677 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352340541231 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.