The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In modern world most of the people use private vehicles as their mode of transport. Therefore it has given favourable and adverse effects to general public and the environment as well. In this essay I would like to discuss on whether restriction has to be imposed to limit the number of vehicles owned by a single person.
As per my experience increased number of vehicles would lead to more traffic conjetion in busy cities mostly in peak hours such as school and office time. And also increased number of vehicles emmit lucrative amount of gases to the environment which would ultimately end up with air pollution.
Some people argue that it is not suitable to limit the number of vehiccle ownership because life is so complex in the modern world. Since in most of the occassions both the wife and the husband do jobs to increase their income level to meet their monetary obligations. Therefore both cannot depend on each other and it is necessary to maintain at least two vehicles per a family unit.
However government can impose such a law after developing a proper public transport medium throughout the country. Besides that government can impose regulations to carry at least two people in a private vehicle in order to mitigate the traffic conjetion.
In conclusion I would suggest the government to maintain a good public transport at a reasonable price to promote people in using public transport than their public vehices. On my point of view it is a good move to restrict the number of vehicles permitted to a family to one because it will reduce air pollution together with save of money for each individual as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...te vehicles as their mode of transport. Therefore it has given favourable and adverse eff...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...given favourable and adverse effects to general public and the environment as well. In this es...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...vel to meet their monetary obligations. Therefore both cannot depend on each other and it...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...east two vehicles per a family unit. However government can impose such a law after ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 58, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'good public transport'.
Suggestion: good public transport
...ould suggest the government to maintain a good public transport at a reasonable price to promote people...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, so, therefore, well, as to, at least, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 31.9359605911 169% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85409252669 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64279864845 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544483985765 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 440.1 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1903475294 50.4703680194 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.666666667 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10483995943 0.242375264174 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0364523585431 0.0925447433944 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323432835409 0.071462118173 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0550492395868 0.151781067708 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132339043325 0.0609392437508 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.