Parents should be held legally responsible for children's acts. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of parental control and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of legal activities is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly as both constructive and positive. I am inclined to believe that humans' behaviour can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, legal responsibilities can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of social development, as well as appropriate acts, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of parental restrictive rules. Had it not been for this discovery, I would not have managed to do so. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both upbringing methods and post-modern societies apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, within the realm of science, children's social activities might increase the consequences of illegal drugs. Moreover, the fundamental elements of being a criminal would relate to this reality that the demerits of a death sentence might pertain to preventing kids. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of correctional centres in correlated negatively with increasing the crime rate. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of rehabilitation.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of responsible parents far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of strict governmental rules prove the significance of the judicial system, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...positive. I am inclined to believe that humans behaviour can be a plus, and I will ana...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58759124088 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29009487392 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660583941606 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0607112351 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.769230769 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135912310913 0.242375264174 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374602725167 0.0925447433944 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0257946031283 0.071462118173 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0698235429806 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286110860775 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.