Problem and benefits for high school students study plays and work of theatres written centuries ago.
The importance of old theatre in high schools which was debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. In my opinion, the former preposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate on both the positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that the old theatre is very important in student's life and the students can learn some things such as cultural background, festivals, and language. Moreover, it also helps for a better future. For example, some schools organized many programs and functions which are related to history and culture. Additionally, some students participated in those functions and also play a crucial role. Needless to say, all these merits stand in good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate this argument but the most alarming one is that many students learn wrong things from old theatre and they can also destroy their culture and them also doing wrong things in their life. In addition, the sati pratha programs can organize in high schools and it also bad impact on students.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach a conclusion the benefits of old theatre are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to wrong'
Suggestion: to wrong
...larming one is that many students learn wrong things from old theatre and they can al...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21338912134 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69298142344 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598326359833 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.8798155068 50.4703680194 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.833333333 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.25397266985 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154334275039 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538417212491 0.0925447433944 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403865849202 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875237385032 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321017463584 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to wrong'
Suggestion: to wrong
...larming one is that many students learn wrong things from old theatre and they can al...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21338912134 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69298142344 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598326359833 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.8798155068 50.4703680194 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.833333333 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.25397266985 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154334275039 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538417212491 0.0925447433944 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403865849202 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875237385032 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321017463584 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.