Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to Society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. To What extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of making a great contribution to society and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contest by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly constructive or consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that professional workers like doctors, nurses and teacher can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, being paid more than sports and entertainment personalities can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic research which discovered the current policies. Thus, ramification on both common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, contributing to society or being paid more than sports might increase the consequence of critical issues. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university asserted the downsides of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of professional workers like doctors and nurses or being paid more than sports far outweigh the drawbacks, not only due to the advantages prove the significance of total outcomes. But also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70428015564 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26074682136 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653696498054 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9705591304 50.4703680194 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.272727273 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265666846753 0.242375264174 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816672052411 0.0925447433944 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898642052685 0.071462118173 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146069258437 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282479981715 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.92 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.