A recent trend in the entertainment world is to adapt classic works of literature for either TV or the movies. One argument is that this is to everyone's benefit, as it introduces people to works they might otherwise never have experienced, while others say that turning books into movies not only cheapens the original but is rarely done successfully.
In your opinion, do works of literature translate effectively to the screen? Support your arguments with the reasons and or examples from your own experience and observations.
Sky should be the limit for entertainment industries. There are various subjects to harness in the field of literature. Some people believe that if film fraternities direct movies based on the fictitious novel, they will get distinctive experience. Others argue that a couple of persons tried in the past, but unfortunately, they did not succeed. I am inclined to believe that someone should take a step forward and try to make a movie based on literature. This essay will discuss the merits and demerits of directing a movie based on the book and will, therefore, reach the logical conclusion.
To commence with, In the past, there were a couple of movies based on mythological topics, and both were incredibly popular. This is because directors did not play with the original contents of the scripts. For instance, Ramayana and Mahabharata two mythological books based movie did a fabulous collection on the silver screen. Eventually, it has already proved that a picture based on literature worked pretty well.
On the other hand, Sometimes, it proved costly to translate pictures based on fictitious novels. Since scripts, writers had tweaked the content and its imagination and creativity. For example, Movie based on the novel 'Two States' did awful on movies theatres because of the scriptwriter.
In my opinion, a technical team should always keep in their mind that the audience is literate and clever nowadays, and they know the fact about novels, literature, etc. Hence, they should not change the originality of any books or novels.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15079365079 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82905060698 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599206349206 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7269051347 50.4703680194 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.5333333333 104.977214359 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.9669160288 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0736096476133 0.242375264174 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0274745561485 0.0925447433944 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028304030064 0.071462118173 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0425368016292 0.151781067708 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196273680424 0.0609392437508 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.