The role of human cloning has accelerated rapidly. To what extent you think will it replace the material things?
In past when there was quest with myriad inventions by analyzed and marked as completed by scientists to cure human's diseases. With curiosity in research to develop clone of human has been kicked off with advancement of medical science. Some people believe that normal material things are going to change in future as like clone human where other argue that medical is not touching this materialistic stuff. n this essay, I shall discuss this view of argument and will provide the logical conclusion.
To start with, people are considering the ease factor in every activities done by clone of human. They believe that inventions budget is spent on the clone of human which may provide multifarious advantages. The development of cloning soars in current time and emphasizing the ability to clone the materialistic subjects in this world. People are considering that this cloning will play important role as like human did.
On the contrary, people argue that there is pace of such development which may trigger the bad influences in society. It is argued that cloning the material objects is not beneficial to human. They are already upgrading their products. Such budget spent on invention with cloning on objects level is like money goes in drain. Destruction may occur in case of failure of clone mechanism's procedure as a human error.
In recapitulate, while people believe strong spark trigger as opt invention of cloning has changed the thinking. In my personal view, invention of human cloning is seduced by people as they provide lots of benefits. I would recommend, clone should be use everywhere and must be within humanitarian's boundaries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 409, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: N
... not touching this materialistic stuff. n this essay, I shall discuss this view o...
^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d will provide the logical conclusion. To start with, people are considering th...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...play important role as like human did. On the contrary, people argue that there...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mechanisms procedure as a human error. In recapitulate, while people believe st...
^^
Line 4, column 62, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ile people believe strong spark trigger as opt invention of cloning has changed th...
^^
Line 4, column 253, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...its. I would recommend, clone should be use everywhere and must be within humanitar...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, while, on the contrary, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 31.9359605911 157% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12592592593 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74408204735 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544444444444 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8211670141 50.4703680194 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.5 104.977214359 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 20.9669160288 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 7.25397266985 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212182579491 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803899701121 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598912108694 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138541084525 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392463669101 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.