Some people think that top level authorities of a company should always take suggestions or ideas from employees to take any decision while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
In today's competition technological era, members of company are bounded with so many stringent policies and demand his company on top list of revenue. Some people believe that members of companys possess right to share idea which can be significant benefits and other people argue that employers are peasants and share only negative thoughts. This essay will discuss both views by analyzing this argument and explore the logical conclusion.
Firstly, there are myriad and multifarious ideas which are engulfed in mind of employees. One reason why the possess this right is that they are actual work on the base of tasks and can suggest better alternative method to complete a task. These people believe that any single fabulous idea from workers can generate huge revenue. They find the workers zone as nurture area for ideas as like war land. They are actually owner of origin for these ideas.
Secondly, people argue that management should not accept any idea from company's member are right on their notion. They mention that management panel has full knowledge for practical tasks and argue that they can suggest adequate steps. For instance, person in management works and monitor peasants team. They argue that how idea can be offshoot from workers when condition of suggestion flow from higher hierarchy to lower hierarchy.
In recapitulate, this essay discussed both facts as aforementioned. In my opinion, idea or suggestion can be come from both parties and onus to select the idea as part of regulation goes to company's owner after passing testimony. I will recommend that there should be no embezzlement in team for financial revenue and everyone come with solidarity thoughts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt and explore the logical conclusion. Firstly, there are myriad and multifario...
^^
Line 2, column 107, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ed in mind of employees. One reason why the possess this right is that they are actual work...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ually owner of origin for these ideas. Secondly, people argue that management s...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m higher hierarchy to lower hierarchy. In recapitulate, this essay discussed bo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17518248175 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58544638439 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580291970803 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1080554362 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5333333333 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211898137356 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070380489884 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560366784198 0.071462118173 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132672382694 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326762982709 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.