Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of product producers to avoid extra packaging of products.
In today's competitive world, people wants commodities available fast, instant with just one call away from them. In terms of product safety, generally it has been observed with over packaging of products. It has been argue that over packing should be avoided either from consumer who is going to use it or product producers who produce it. I shall explain my point of view by analyzing both sides of this argument and explore the logical conclusion.
Firstly, there are lots of company who emphasize the extra packing and want their product safe and secure with packaging defined parameters. For example, electronic items, are wrapped in multi-layer packing. It is believed that for cuisine products such as vegetables, fruits, they usually do not need extra packing. If this responsibility impose from producer's side, then consumer don't need to take any action and they can find their product secure. To secure products, onus must remain with producers.
Secondly, those who argue that commodity packing onus with consumer is different view and say that there is not accurate management. There are some consumers those who aware of securing the product with layers of packing but still there may be gap of wrapping different type of products. Consumers do not possess automation tool to wrap the products in proper controlled environment.
In recapitulate, My point of view that onus of packing the products must be remain with producers as they possess all tools and controlled environment and state the packing level. I would recommend, consumers can raise their voice if packaging level do not meet the defined parameters by submitting grievances.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In todays competitive world, people want...
^^^
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'argued'.
Suggestion: argued
...over packaging of products. It has been argue that over packing should be avoided eit...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...going to use it or product producers who produce it. I shall explain my point of ...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt and explore the logical conclusion. Firstly, there are lots of company who e...
^^
Line 2, column 384, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...pose from producers side, then consumer dont need to take any action and they can fi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ucts, onus must remain with producers. Secondly, those who argue that commodity...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts in proper controlled environment. In recapitulate, My point of view that o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20599250936 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69187054116 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569288389513 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5924117874 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2857142857 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368317993672 0.242375264174 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119972953744 0.0925447433944 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906984666178 0.071462118173 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217215438755 0.151781067708 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383897838297 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.