Some people think that there are things individuals can do to help prevent global climate change. Other believe that action by individuals is useless and irrelevant and that it is only governments and large businesses which can make a difference. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In today's world, people are very concerned about global climate change due to myriad problems and they want course of actions to save this earth from human's bad activities. Some people believe that individual efforts are much enough to secede the pollution from air, sound and oceans while other people argue that regimes and large ventures can produce the adequate outcomes. In this essay, I shall discuss both views by analzying this argument an explore the logical conclusion.
Firstly, there are myriad and conspicuous actions which can be performed by individuals. One of them is restrict or cut down the plastic use in general use while shopping from supermarkets. For example if consumers decline all factors such as packaging with plastics, restrict burning of fossil fuels and seclude any wastage throwing in ocean can affect and create a vital action to save this earth. This action can inspire and enlighten others which would say that individual's action show a solidarity performance.
Secondly, there are other factors for which governments and large business can play a pivotal role to restrict this carbon dioxide emission from vehicles and preclude the usage of plastics. Government who possess all rules and regulations can impose the heavy fines with stringent action on infringement of littering. Businesses always pursue the norms and use minimum raw materials in growth of their business which can do lethal effect to earth's environment.
In recapitulate, there are strong views for this argument and in my personal view, the onus of preventing the global climate change and protect the earth environment goes to either individual or government and business. I would recommend that regime should campaign the bad influence of CO2 emission from vehicles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In todays world, people are very concern...
^^
Line 1, column 448, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s both views by analzying this argument an explore the logical conclusion. Firstly, the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent an explore the logical conclusion. Firstly, there are myriad and conspicuou...
^^
Line 2, column 106, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'restricted'.
Suggestion: restricted
...erformed by individuals. One of them is restrict or cut down the plastic use in general ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 468, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...d enlighten others which would say that individuals action show a solidarity performance. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... action show a solidarity performance. Secondly, there are other factors for wh...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o lethal effect to earths environment. In recapitulate, there are strong views ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28268551237 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64685303955 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621908127208 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8371884534 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.583333333 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30813543869 0.242375264174 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1070201942 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746664428063 0.071462118173 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175767857324 0.151781067708 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462059934918 0.0609392437508 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.