Some people think that there are things individuals can do to help prevent global climate change. Other believe that action by individuals is useless and irrelevant and that it is only governments and large business which can make a difference. Discuss these views and give your own opinion.
In today's world, pollution is ubiquitous and testimony can be seen omnipotence in shore of oceans, air in cities and soil. The air quality is jeopardizing to everyone and need attention on priority basis. Some people believe that individual efforts are irrelevant with nix output and other argues that regimes possess power to rule to cure the quality of life to make it unambiguous. This essay will discuss both views and explore the logical conclusion.
Firstly, there are epitome solutions by individual which act as a solidarity action to clear the clouds of pollution. One of them is cleaning his/her own vicinity to present a paradigm for everyone. In addition, it includes using less consumption of harmful pollutant objects such as plastic made products like plastic bottles. Individual should abide to control misuse of public places. By doing so, other people will inspire to imitate the litter free zones in ocean, soil and vicinity.
Secondly, governments always have deed with solidarity legislation to make people pursue the rules and regulation to save the environment. Regimes may levy the heavy penalty on offender who infringement of spreading littering. Human activities such as industry, burning of fossils fuel can be scrutiny to control the pollutants in air. Government can impose people to use public conveyances. Government can play a pivotal role by introducing the laws to save our mother earth.
In recapitulate, this essay has discussed both views. In my personal opinion, the onus for controlling the pollution goes to both parties either individual or government. I will recommend if both come forward to save this earth then few are enough rather than many decades.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In todays world, pollution is ubiquitous...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ws and explore the logical conclusion. Firstly, there are epitome solutions by ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ree zones in ocean, soil and vicinity. Secondly, governments always have deed w...
^^
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'have' and 'deed'.
Suggestion: have always deed
... and vicinity. Secondly, governments always have deed with solidarity legislation to make peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 37, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'deeded'.
Suggestion: deeded
...y. Secondly, governments always have deed with solidarity legislation to make peo...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing the laws to save our mother earth. In recapitulate, this essay has discusse...
^^
Line 4, column 62, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...s essay has discussed both views. In my personal opinion, the onus for controlling the pollution...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2380952381 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81876164656 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663003663004 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9756611593 50.4703680194 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1176470588 104.977214359 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0588235294 20.9669160288 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29411764706 7.25397266985 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218409674031 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596376973605 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554224291807 0.071462118173 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115747971525 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044426081463 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.