Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need addition funding, but other think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. Choose which position you must agree

Essay topics:

Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need addition funding, but other think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. Choose which position you must agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observation or reading?

People consider advertisements a way to achieve sell target and revenue source which is a stringent strategy from promoters. They hunt for places where they can place these hoarding to showcase their products and allure the public. Some people believe that placing hoarding in schools is a significance scope to achieve target sales and other people argue to put these advertisements away from students not to distract them. In this essay, I shall discuss both views by analyzing this argument and explore the logical conclusion
To start with, there are myriad and conspicuous ways to put advertisements in every place to spread the knowledge in market. For example, public places such as bus-stand, railway platforms, sports venue, education center etc. People think that placing hoarding in schools or colleges give extension for their products and emphasize in revenue for school. Educationalists and students both take a glance of promotions, offers and participate in sales of company.
On contrary, people argue that these advertisements should not be in education places such as schools and colleges. They believe that it allures the students to step in stray time zone which is very harmful for them in term of loss of low performance in examination. Placing a promotion offers in schools distract students and my provide financially loses once they buy the products. People prefer our education places must be clear of thoughts without any distracting materials.
In recapitulate, while there are strong facts discussed for this argument. In my personal view, promotions of any commodities should not be part of pupil's life. I will recommend there are myriad places where promotions can be placed.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent and explore the logical conclusion To start with, there are myriad and cons...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and participate in sales of company. On contrary, people argue that these adv...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hts without any distracting materials. In recapitulate, while there are strong ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, for example, such as, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29044117647 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87318234628 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7400782137 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.785714286 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 7.25397266985 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261957920232 0.242375264174 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898920464732 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759522129532 0.071462118173 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158178713513 0.151781067708 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688220834217 0.0609392437508 113% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.