In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may into need any formal qualifications. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today's, for any job, practical knowledge is adequate primarily however theoretical education is also imperative for individual growth. Some people believe that practical education does all well and on contrary other argue that theoretical knowledge does all without any practical experience. In this essay, I shall discuss both views by analyzing this argument and explore logical conclusion.
To start with, people believing in practical information is enough to provide daily wadges. They argue that some work in society is kind of, where people don't require any theoretical knowledge. For example salesman on shop, assistant in car factory, supermarket's ancillary is epitome example. They believe why they go for theoretical knowledge when they have all in hand and can acquire all knowledge without taking any class.
On contrary, people argue that person doing job always novice and can acquire a level of past master after learning from mistakes. For example, people working on computer's task, computer printing, game zone, salesman etc. However knowledge while commencing any work in life provide a glance of view not to repeat any mistake. People argue to secede these barriers as primarily hindrance.
In recapitulate, there are strong facts for this argument and signals that both aspects complete each other. In my personal opinion, I believe in notion that both practical skills and theoretical knowledge are imperative for acquiring the goal in life. I would recommend, taking theoretical classes before commencing any job is not a bad idea.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In todays, for any job, practical knowle...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gument and explore logical conclusion. To start with, people believing in pract...
^^
Line 2, column 156, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ork in society is kind of, where people dont require any theoretical knowledge. For ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll knowledge without taking any class. On contrary, people argue that person do...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...these barriers as primarily hindrance. In recapitulate, there are strong facts ...
^^
Line 4, column 117, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...both aspects complete each other. In my personal opinion, I believe in notion that both practica...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld recommend, taking theoretical classes before commencing any job is not a bad i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, well, while, for example, kind of, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42386831276 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72941591861 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588477366255 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.0195841659 50.4703680194 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.1428571429 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3571428571 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136136859909 0.242375264174 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495719336334 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440074159889 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.090945388847 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216025651728 0.0609392437508 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 53.1260098522 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.