Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person’s age. In the workplace, these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimination against older workers be made illegal?
In today's technological era, Every firm has different kind of employees which differentiate in terms of performance and age. Member working in organization may be working hard for livelihood but may face discrimination with respect to his/her job. In my personal view, organization has no rights to dismiss any employee on the basis of age unless incongruity constraint or disciplinary issue occurs. I shall discuss the both views by analyzing this arguments and provide a logical conclusion.
Firstly, members in ventures are bounded with policies and regulations terms, they need to perform their aim in a deadline. It is also claimed that person working since long time may get less productive but still an assets to company whose knowledge and predecessors experience provide guide to novice joined employees. For example, older guy on manager post has knowledge to differentiate between bad and good. The potential and capabilities to make good decisions are attached to these people.
Secondly, people work and get aged during work tenure but other people believe that discrimination should be illegal if they loose their job without any reason. Some company gives award for performance and productivity to younger employee and present them as a lead which is not correct by hiding the main feat achiever. Living in society old age person are always have less voting in their favor.
In recapitulate, person working in company must be given rights to teach other novice employees in participating for revenue growth and doesn't consider for illegal laws and policies. I would recommend, government/regime must have scrutiny for performance and endurance records for individual employee.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 446, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...all discuss the both views by analyzing this arguments and provide a logical conclus...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents and provide a logical conclusion. Firstly, members in ventures are bounded...
^^
Line 2, column 215, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an asset' or simply 'assets'?
Suggestion: an asset; assets
... time may get less productive but still an assets to company whose knowledge and predeces...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecisions are attached to these people. Secondly, people work and get aged durin...
^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...iscrimination should be illegal if they loose their job without any reason. Some comp...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...ng in society old age person are always have less voting in their favor. In recap...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lways have less voting in their favor. In recapitulate, person working in compa...
^^
Line 4, column 139, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...in participating for revenue growth and doesnt consider for illegal laws and policies....
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, for example, kind of, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37218045113 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02277381106 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657894736842 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6678680097 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.923076923 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.33497536946 150% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143515054668 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482472557237 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468356557652 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837318192795 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043716254049 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.