Does e-learning have a prosperous future? Do you agree or disagree?
In pastime when pupils went to schools to get education as per curriculum of schools. Attending to grasp education in school provides lot of opportunities and remote learning provide other benefits. Some people believe that e-learning have a prosperous future and other people argue that e-learning do not provide several benefits. This essay will discuss both views of this argument and will explore a logical conclusion.
Firstly, there are multifarious and myriad advantages of e-learning. One of them is secure environment of learning by nurturing away from bully students. They believe that e-learning provide course at personal convenience and do not disturb personal schedules. In addition, pupils do not need to commute to institutes to attend lectures. Other advantages for colleges and schools itself is that they don't need to hire lecturers and teachers which may save lots of their revenue.
Secondly, people believe that e-learning is not adequate to learn education. One factor they argue is that there is lack of mate and team spirit in pupils which is possible only by attending physically in school. In addition e-learning do not provide any opportunity for sports participation. Students do not get any extra-curriculum activities such drama, dance and other contests. These reasons are enough to state that e-learning is not adequate channel to gain knowledge.
In conclusion, this essay discussed the both views as advantages and disadvantages. The disadvantages outweigh the advantages. In my personal opinion, e-learning is not adequate medium to cross the academic and professional education phases. The medium is only valid for students who is disabled or who is not available for schools.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In pastime when pupils went to schools t...
^^
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to provide'
Suggestion: to provide
...ot of opportunities and remote learning provide other benefits. Some people believe tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and will explore a logical conclusion. Firstly, there are multifarious and myri...
^^^^
Line 2, column 404, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...olleges and schools itself is that they dont need to hire lecturers and teachers whi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which may save lots of their revenue. Secondly, people believe that e-learning...
^^^
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...y by attending physically in school. In addition e-learning do not provide any opportuni...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot adequate channel to gain knowledge. In conclusion, this essay discussed the ...
^^
Line 4, column 135, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...vantages outweigh the advantages. In my personal opinion, e-learning is not adequate medium to c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43820224719 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01463463706 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539325842697 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6551724138 142% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.4096343052 50.4703680194 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.6666666667 104.977214359 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8333333333 20.9669160288 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05555555556 7.25397266985 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.33497536946 150% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180137208693 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552215820961 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746735057247 0.071462118173 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106339443681 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527264861151 0.0609392437508 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 12.6369458128 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 53.1260098522 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.68 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.