Poverty is a major issue world wide. Many charities exist to help collect monetary donations. Who should decide what the donations are spent on? The people in need or the charitable organizations?
Since past, poor people are still associated with societies in this world in spite of increase in literacy rate. Peasants do not have guarantee and potential to earn on daily basis for their livelihood. It has been stated that charities are preponderant small regime and have big apt role for these poor people. In this essay, I shall discuss both sides by analyzing this argument and provide the best conclusion.
Firstly, Charity's organizers are people who had pain and sorrows in past with same intensity as poor people have today. These organizers come forward to help these poor people by providing shelter and meals. For example, every big venture has their charity trust who collect money from volunteers as monetary donations and organize camp to aid these poor literacy people. They have seen where they commence the camp for free eye checkup, medication, yoga and many more. Charities are conspicuous espouse of people who are living below poverty line.
Secondly, It has been stated that organizer may be head of volunteers or any concern part of government. However some corrupt people embezzle all money to increase their standard of life. These people think about themselves only in terms to fulfill their all swanky amenities. To shoot this problem, a part of government as trusted regime may surveillance the events and act as a pain killer for poor people.
In recapitulate, there are strong arguments for organizer who collection and distribute money to surpass to poor peoples as an first aid. I would recommend government must come forward to campaign the education importance in individual life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'guaranteed'.
Suggestion: guaranteed
... in literacy rate. Peasants do not have guarantee and potential to earn on daily basis fo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ument and provide the best conclusion. Firstly, Charitys organizers are people ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple who are living below poverty line. Secondly, It has been stated that organi...
^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...eers or any concern part of government. However some corrupt people embezzle all money ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... act as a pain killer for poor people. In recapitulate, there are strong argume...
^^
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ute money to surpass to poor peoples as an first aid. I would recommend government...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11320754717 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59595215752 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603773584906 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.3481542862 50.4703680194 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.3333333333 104.977214359 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175092744735 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612415720085 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602145029046 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103158958902 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783220993897 0.0609392437508 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.