Most people in what are known as the developed nations have homes full of gadgets and labor-saving devices, from vacuum cleaners and dishwashers to the latest in computer technology. Some people claim that despite all these labor-saving devices, we seem to have less free time. In your opinion, have technology improved the quality of life or made it more complicated? Support your arguments with reasons and/or examples from your own experience and observations?
In today's technological era, homes in this world are occupied with lots of gadgets and electronic devices which are acclimate by this generation. Some people believe in notion that these gadgets devices are beneficial and provide ample of time without disturbance and other people argue that life is made complicated and in result no free time for some other preponderant tasks. I reckon the notion in believe that gadgets device are used friendly and will provide the logical result after discussion positives.
Firstly, There are conspicuous reasons why these gadgets are useful and effect our daily life in way to secede all manual tasks by playing pivotal roles. People have view for saving money with time with result of using these labor-saving machines. The bounding of begin and completion task to be done with switch on or off without performing any manual tasks. If we remove these electronic gadgets from homes then it would be biased conditions where people will feel more uncomfortable.
Secondly, there are several gadgets available in home which require switch on or off to work done. These labor-saving devices are apt useful and consumed if used in conform and appropriate condition. For example gym machines, dishwashers, iron, washing machine, vacuum cleaner and many more. These devices secede all manual efforts and have provided plenty of free time to people to concentrate on other important tasks. Today's life is advanced life and people always keen to find some automation gadget.
Ultimately, with these gadgets people are often considered more happy as well as healthy. I would recommend that people have understanding and knowledge to use equipment in secure and safe directions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'acclimated'.
Suggestion: acclimated
...adgets and electronic devices which are acclimate by this generation. Some people believe...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 416, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'gadgets'' or 'gadget's'?
Suggestion: gadgets'; gadget's
...ks. I reckon the notion in believe that gadgets device are used friendly and will provi...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cal result after discussion positives. Firstly, There are conspicuous reasons w...
^^
Line 2, column 362, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ff without performing any manual tasks. If we remove these electronic gadgets from...
^^
Line 2, column 489, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re people will feel more uncomfortable. Secondly, there are several gadgets avai...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s keen to find some automation gadget. Ultimately, with these gadgets people ar...
^^
Line 4, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... have understanding and knowledge to use equipment in secure and safe directions....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, i reckon, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24452554745 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65086386417 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56204379562 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2613494558 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.642857143 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252530161557 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899087452342 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577799467835 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164874007067 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471129663136 0.0609392437508 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.