Tobacco, mainly in the form of cigarettes is one of the most widely used drugs in the world. Over a billion adults legally smoke tobacco every day. The long-term health costs are high- for the smokers themselves, and for the wider community in terms of health care costs and lost productivity.Do Governments have a legitimate role to protect citizens from the harmful effects of their own decisions to smoke, or are such decisions up to an individual?”
Since past time, Cigarettes which are built with tobacco are being legally used for smokking in this world. The chronical effect are very catastrophic for human being cause loss of life with huge money in drain. In my personal view, Governments possess all norms and regulation to handle these decisions to smoke as compare to individual's decision. In this essay, I shall discuss role of governments to protect people from chronical harmful effect and will provide logical conclusion.
Firstly, Governments is main regime which can play preponderant role to legitimate the smokking in public and private areas. It is clearly evident that people smokking causes ebriety of it and governments condemn always with providing the warning messages in all entertainment channels. This has been stated that once governments notify the public with their good decions on public and get light on these chronical deseases factor which produced cancers and many more deseases in terms of loss of productivity and financial as well.
Secondly, decisions are being taken by individual cause less impact. It has been seen that once this smoking habit pursued by individual, there are very less chances to evade it until a stringent regime levies on individual. Governments have regime with norms and regulation through proper channel to awake communicate to public. For example, government ban smoking in public places. A strong message for harmful influences of cigarettes can be conveyed by governments only in spite of individual decisions.
In recapitulate, governments have authority to ban the smoking and individual has less control over their smoking appetite in terms of ebriety. I would recommend that people must read warning message on packets of this harmful product and take their decision for betterment of personal and family lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
Since past time, Cigarettes which are built with tobacc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...acco are being legally used for smokking in this world. The chronical effect are ...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t and will provide logical conclusion. Firstly, Governments is main regime whic...
^^
Line 2, column 207, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put before the verb 'condemn'.
Suggestion: always condemn
...ng causes ebriety of it and governments condemn always with providing the warning messages in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of productivity and financial as well. Secondly, decisions are being taken by i...
^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...t pursued by individual, there are very less chances to evade it until a stringent r...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nly in spite of individual decisions. In recapitulate, governments have author...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35294117647 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76039133092 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557093425606 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4235757412 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.25397266985 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122677138216 0.242375264174 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487749477572 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574623550796 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816985615904 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355731265167 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.