Tobacco, mainly in the form of cigarettes, is one of the most widely-used drugs in the world. Over a billion adults legally smoke tobacco every day. The long term health costs are high – for smokers themselves, and for the wider community in terms of health care costs and lost productivity.
Do governments have a legitimate role to legislate to protect citizens from the harmful effects of their decisions to smoke, or are such decisions up to the individual?
Recently a phenomenon of in taking drug has sparked an ongoing controversy which inevitably leads to a moot question, whose responsibility it is to avoid smoking? where it is held view that government has a major role however many hold its opposite view that it is a person's choice. In this essay I will discuss both the topics with related examples.
From the social standpoint, tobacco is the most harmful drug that has offer a noticeable effect in the society which are rooted in the fact that its addiction among human being are inextricably bound up. According to my experience when I was a university student I performed an experiment which discovered that strong legislative regulations such as introducing fine, restrictions on importing or producing cigarettes, introducing smoke free public space, creating smoking room and many more can constrain people to stop or reducing the exposure of smoke in the atmosphere. Hence, beneficial ramification of government rules as an effective solution can be seen.
Within the realm of society, an individual has a enormous impact in a major scale. Moreover fundamental aspect of smoking in a area where younger generation inspires is technically harmful for the growing ones as well as the non smokers. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that person can never help to prevent themselves from addictions, unless or until a strict rules applies. Thus, it is correct to presume the notion of tobacco a harmful drug to be avoided by government.
To conclude, I profoundly believe that the benefits of rules obliged by government organization far compliments safer environment. Not only create better and healthier nation but also providing with strict acceptance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Where
... responsibility it is to avoid smoking? where it is held view that government has a m...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...hat government has a major role however many hold its opposite view that it is a persons ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'offered'.
Suggestion: offered
...bacco is the most harmful drug that has offer a noticeable effect in the society whic...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'a' or 'my'?
Suggestion: a; my
...are inextricably bound up. According to a my experience when I was a university stud...
^^^^
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ividual has an impact in a micro scale. Moreover fundamental aspect of smoking in a area...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...reover fundamental aspect of smoking in a area where younger generation inspire t...
^
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'rule'?
Suggestion: rule
...m addictions, unless or untill a strict rules apply. Thus, it is correct to presume t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20640569395 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01034382289 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644128113879 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.3499981065 50.4703680194 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.916666667 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0926328305893 0.242375264174 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0285567917988 0.0925447433944 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357233511571 0.071462118173 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0461737838241 0.151781067708 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343384881183 0.0609392437508 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.