Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work. Some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience, such as international travel and volunteering. Support with examples or cases.
Recently, the phenomenon of youngster and its corresponding dedication has sparked an ongoing debate, in which field young people should focus? Whereas many believe at early age of time one’s focal point is education or career, however many believe its opposite that for widen experience one must take part on activities. In this essay, I will discuss both side of the argument with related examples.
From the social standpoint, youths great sense of learning and grooming can offer a noticeable effect in society which can rooted in fact that success and other extraordinary achievement are inevitably bound up. According to my experience when I was a university student I performed an academic experiment which discovered that attention towards career at young age creates great sense of opportunities, broad up one’s perspective on social issues and get the ability to tackle situation of different kind. Thus beneficial ramifications of the youngster as asset for the country is seen.
Within the realm of experience, at young age focusing on other activities such as volunteering, travelling and many more might increase the cause of failure in professionalism. Moreover fundamental aspects of knowledge deficiency could relate to this reality that stairs to reach success will pertain to ever going process. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of ineffective education creates difficulty to survive in a multicultural world. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of energizing only on other activity can give broaden experience within specific zone.
To end, there are several compelling argument on both, I profoundly believe that benefits of career concentration further complementing future. Not only allowing think in broader perspective but also emerging sophisticated behaviour.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...parked an ongoing debate, in which field young people should focus? Whereas many ...
^^
Line 3, column 513, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... to tackle situation of different kind. Thus beneficial ramifications of the youngst...
^^^^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...he cause of failure in professionalism. Moreover fundamental aspects of knowledge defici...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 644, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her activity can give broaden experience within specific zone. To end, there ...
^^
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... complementing future. Not only allowing think in broader perspective but also em...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, whereas, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62847222222 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14787729465 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9601719662 50.4703680194 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.083333333 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110254834572 0.242375264174 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361314619234 0.0925447433944 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431438959042 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0573069829457 0.151781067708 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376951456885 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.