Technological innovation has effected our lives.do you agree or disagree?
Recently a phenomenon of technological revolution has sparked an ongoing debate which inevitably leads to a moot question, is it helpful to have ever-growing revolution? Whereas it is held view that it is hampering our live however many holds it opposite view.
From the social standpoint, applied science has provided a noticeable effect in a society which are rooted in the fact that life has become a lot easier and faster which are inextricably bound up. According to my experience when I was university student I performed an experiment which discovered that innovation of these kind has connected lost communications, create awareness about world, reduce travel time, brought more effective time and many other. Thus, beneficial ramification of advancement in science can be seen.
Within the realm of science, it is not only helping our society to grow but also creating some adverse effect. Moreover fundamental aspect of technology improvements in some cases acting as bad effect such as people misusing the mobiles, tracking records of one another, erasing of one’s privacy, fake identities to pretend someone else, machines are overtaking labours and many other. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of technology behaving as curse for some sort.
To conclude there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of applied science far outweigh its drawback. Not only it is helping to connect people but also allowing the working system stronger.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun other seems to be countable; consider using: 'many others'.
Suggestion: many others
...l time, brought more effective time and many other. Thus, beneficial ramification of advan...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... but also creating some adverse effect. Moreover fundamental aspect of technology improv...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 380, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun other seems to be countable; consider using: 'many others'.
Suggestion: many others
...se, machines are overtaking labours and many other. Hence, it is correct to presume the pr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, whereas, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1291.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37916666667 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93895944832 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683333333333 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.9792111988 50.4703680194 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.1 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123243041373 0.242375264174 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405310974999 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316547994198 0.071462118173 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0606122163242 0.151781067708 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410287424022 0.0609392437508 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.