Most people in what are known as the developed nations have homes full of gadgets and labor-saving devices, from vacuum cleaners and dishwashers to the latest in computer technology. Some people claim that despite all these labor-saving devices, we seem to have less free time. In your opinion, has technology improved the quality of life or made it more complicated? Support your arguments with reasons and/or examples from your own experience and observations.
These days, a multitude of critical issues are being debated all over the world and a massive upsurge in the technological improvement is one of the most controversial one. There is a widespread belief among the people, where some think that the advancement of technology has been boon to the society and people while some believe this has paralysed and are so dependant on such innovations. In my opinion, the notion is a valid and merits serious considerations. I will explain the key points of my stance with the help of supporting arguments and instances.
To begin with, the recent development of the labor saving gadgets to help the general people have greatly added the people to do more work in very less time which has given them ample amount of time to do other necessary activities. More output in lesser time has been highly appreciated globally minimising the cost of employment and bettered the efficiency and effectiveness. For example, since the use of vacuüm cleaners in hotels has eased the pressure from the worker, with tasks completed in shorter time.
Another pivotal aspect, is that though the use of technologies we are still not been able to manage time for ourselves. being so relied to these resources that when these break down and we need to do by self its causes pain and body aches. Also most importantly, the computer technology has caused so much chaotic in the labor market that many jobs has been redundant. As machines have been giving perfect results than that of human beings. For instance, the stats published my the labour market showed the people are being replaced by machines has caused higher unemployed rates.
Finally, after taking points into considerations, from a personal perspective, I am inclined to believe that the faster and well organised gadgets helpful efficient and coherent development of both individual and society outweigh the drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oon to the society and people while some believe this has paralysed and are so de...
^^
Line 1, column 363, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
... believe this has paralysed and are so dependant on such innovations. In my opinion, the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Being
...been able to manage time for ourselves. being so relied to these resources that when ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...by self its causes pain and body aches. Also most importantly, the computer technolo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rket that many jobs has been redundant. As machines have been giving perfect resul...
^^
Line 7, column 22, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...employed rates. Finally, after taking points into considerations, from a perso...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, in short, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 316.0 242.827586207 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0664556962 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77817643439 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601265822785 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7893221576 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.153846154 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177835252929 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494382136947 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457523995665 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914309237366 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320075209566 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.