Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers ?

Essay topics:

Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers ?

In past time when people used to wrap for carry any edible or any other commodities which tree's leaf or recycle stuff are overtaken by plastic with extra amount of packaging. Some people consider it harmful for environment and impose the responsibility of consumer and other people argue that extra packaging is responsibility of producers. In this essay, I shall discuss both views by analyzing this argument and explore the logical conclusion.
Firstly, consumers buy the product from market and judge the quality of products with level of packaging to preserve it. In today's era of life, consumers consider high packaging to protect the food or any other product without noticing the harmful influences of plastic wrapping. Consumers can give feedback and implement it on adequate level of packaging. The level of packaging is mainly depend on product's perishable quality. It must be avoided by consumers as they have solidarity opinion as public prospective.
Secondly, the onus of avoiding the extra packaging for products is goes to producers who develop and deliver the product to supermarkets. They have measures to check the level of packaging and it should not cross above the designated limit. For example milk products, electronic product which are required packaging from producers instead of consumers. It is argued that producers are only who have experts and equipment to check wrapping level of any products.
In recapitulate, there are strong views for this argument. In my personal view, producers should take care the level of packaging and should follow the norms and standard. It is highly recommended that regime should scrutiny the quality and ages of product with packaging.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In past time when people used to wrap fo...
^^
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
In past time when people used to wrap for carry any ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt and explore the logical conclusion. Firstly, consumers buy the product from ...
^^
Line 2, column 392, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...aging. The level of packaging is mainly depend on products perishable quality. It must...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...idarity opinion as public prospective. Secondly, the onus of avoiding the extra...
^^
Line 3, column 464, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o check wrapping level of any products. In recapitulate, there are strong views ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26102941176 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78353015374 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533088235294 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 455.4 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0168980305 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53333333333 7.25397266985 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30772079234 0.242375264174 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105456970299 0.0925447433944 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706839809965 0.071462118173 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183667701785 0.151781067708 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638717009479 0.0609392437508 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 12.6369458128 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.