The claim that animals have "rights" has been the subject of much debate since the 1970s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned ? Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, due to deforestation animals are coming to urban areas, captured and presented to public in zoos or museums in this world. Some people believe that zoos are giving re-habitation to animals and other people argue that zoos are not safe and hurting them. This is very inevitable and hot topic for debate since long time. I reckon the notion to believe zoos are built for safety of animals and provide them security whose come to public area. I will discuss both views and give you a logical conclusion.
Firstly, There are numerous profound advantages of zoos or museums which play a vital role by providing security them. For example, if any leopard animal come to public area and may create a threat to human being life. Zoos catch these type of animal and heal them from any wound. In addition, regimes catch animals and place in zoo to analyse them by providing all healthy conditions. Moreover, an outlook view opens for public to see wild animals to help them for revenue. Zoos cure and rehabilitation them by providing all wild conditions.
Secondly, with advantages ,there is disadvantages exists as well. Animals are caught from wild to put into jail where they do not feed properly and die in less age. For example, lions do run to deer and eat them. In zoos they get gosh without physical work and get disease in early age. This way zoos do not provide proper environment cause to their death.
In recapitulate, zoos are built for safety not for hurting them. I would recommend, animals should have limit of duration to zoo so that they can return to jungle and we should cultivate trees and don't participate in deforestation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, due to deforestation animals a...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ews and give you a logical conclusion. Firstly, There are numerous profound adv...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...them by providing all wild conditions. Secondly, with advantages ,there is disa...
^^^^
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nditions. Secondly, with advantages ,there is disadvantages exists as well. A...
^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[3]
Message: Did you mean 'there are disadvantages'?
Suggestion: there are disadvantages
...itions. Secondly, with advantages ,there is disadvantages exists as well. Animals are caught from...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oper environment cause to their death. In recapitulate, zoos are built for safe...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'limited'.
Suggestion: limited
... I would recommend, animals should have limit of duration to zoo so that they can ret...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 203, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ungle and we should cultivate trees and dont participate in deforestation.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, i reckon, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 8.36945812808 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76573426573 5.00649968141 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52426485377 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573426573427 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6551724138 142% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5027433648 50.4703680194 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.7222222222 104.977214359 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8888888889 20.9669160288 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72222222222 7.25397266985 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.33497536946 150% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255448214879 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840447023151 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428622428812 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166044829248 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332500031079 0.0609392437508 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 12.6369458128 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.1260098522 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.9458128079 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 11.5310837438 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.32886699507 90% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.