Talk about pros/cons of this era as it is full of daily inventions?
Today's world is full of discoveries and inventions which has placed the era of daily inventions. People follow and consume these inventions in terms of ease the daily activities and to raise the comfortable level. Mobile applications connected with internet have sparked the ease level in greater extent. Some people believe that usage of application provides profound advantages and other people argue not useful. In this essay I shall discuss both views by analyzing of this argument and provide the logical conclusion.
To start with, there are multifarious and myriad positives influences on public. One of them is improved communication in between people which has decreased the distance between societies. For example, any information can be passed through application connecting to internet such as Whatsapp, Facebook, Skype and many others. Any blistering news do not have to wait for person to go manually rather than mobile voice.
On contrary, people arguing application and see it as disadvantages in our life have omnipotence influences. One of them is security issue as application tracks always your location and data access. Secondly, there are violent videos and unpleasant news can be shared across these platform. They argue that privacy of person is very flammable in this era of technology. Too much inventions emphasize the frustration level of individual.
In recapitulate, while there are positives and negatives of this invention, In my personal view I believe notions advantages are various if application used in boundaries of humanitarian. I would recommend Cyber security should scrutiny the conversation over these application to remove bad elements from society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt and provide the logical conclusion. To start with, there are multifarious an...
^^
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...lammable in this era of technology. Too much inventions emphasize the frustration le...
^^^^
Line 4, column 260, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this application' or 'these applications'?
Suggestion: this application; these applications
...y should scrutiny the conversation over these application to remove bad elements from society.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50191570881 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00773848649 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632183908046 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4584202705 50.4703680194 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.75 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3125 20.9669160288 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.25397266985 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132016804905 0.242375264174 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446706322461 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728322739213 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074111220911 0.151781067708 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719642891595 0.0609392437508 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 53.1260098522 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.