Should men and women divide household work equally. Do you agree or disagree with the statement?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the equal division of household work among men and women. Some people think that women should mainly contribute towards domestic works, while others maintain that both men and women should equally pool in their share to accomplish everyday tasks. This essay will discuss that why both men and women should equally share the burden of daily tasks.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments is favour of men and women to equally share domestic burden. Firstly, the most conspicuous is that there is huge workload in the home. Therefore, it is nearly impossible for any single person to manage all the household tasks followed by the upbringing of children in a befitting manner. For instance, women have numerous responsibilties at home which start from cooking food, cleanliness and taking care of children; hence all these tasks cannot be accomplished in an efficient manner without the support of her life partner. As a result, it is quite evident that owing to heavy burden at home both genders should equally contribute.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet of this argument is that each person in life wants some leisure time. Thus, free time slots can only be created by sharing the burden of each other. For instance, if household jobs are equally divided between men and women, then not only extra time is generated but also a better understanding is developed and flourished among partners. As a matter of fact, equal division of routine jobs among men and women promotes love, respect and generates leisure time.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that equal contribution of men and women in daily jobs not only lessens burden but also promotes love, respect and creates free time in their lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-11 | Dinuka Dissanayaje | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-11 | bVP6525 | 72 | view |
| 2019-01-19 | Rohit mahajan | 55 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | mohseny | 88 | view |
| 2018-08-29 | Anonymous | 77 | view |
- The means of communicating in society today has changed markedly over the last ten years In your opinion what are the positive and negative impacts of this change 70
- Some people spend too much time on work than their personal/private life and experience time shortage. What problems does it cause. 85
- Some people think that they can learn better by themselves than with a teacher others think in opposite way. Which one do you prefer? 80
- Nowadays many young people leave home at an early age to either study or work in another city.To what extent do you agree? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experiences. 56
- Individual citizens have nothing to do for complex environmental problems. Do you agree or disagree? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient manner" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... all these tasks cannot be accomplished in an efficient manner without the support of her life partner...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 681, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...both genders should equally contribute. On the other hand, another pivotal facet...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for instance, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06688963211 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52736170466 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558528428094 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8649872838 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.538461538 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.25397266985 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180375309672 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707100695779 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574882172211 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113306840327 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612030002973 0.0609392437508 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.