In some countries, the no of shooting increase because many people have guns at home. to what extent do you agree and disagree.
The importance of the in some countries, the no shootings increase because many people have guns at home to what extent do you agree or disagree, which has always been debatable has now upsurge a lots of a arguments in favor and against it, thus it has become even more controversial. The substantial influence of imitating celebrities has sparked controversy over the potential of this trends is an integral part of the society in recent years. It can be agreed that the upside of imitating celebrities are instruments indeed, however it has some various drawbacks as well. This essay will be elaborate on both assertions and provide a well-weighted conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why the in some countries, the no shooting increase because many people have guns at home is unreservedly salient, but the most conspicuous one lies fact that advantage. Therefore, it is a vital time to appreciate both the significance of the in some country, the no shooting increase because many people have guns at home for the ameliorations of society.
However, it has some various who choose to think differently and hold an opposing viewpoint. Which can certainly overwhelm substantial influence of the in some countries, the no shooting increase because many people have guns at home? Nevertheless, the contradiction is rooted in the fact that disadvantage. Hence, it is apparent that the downside of the no of the shooting increase because many people have guns at home cannot be overlooked.
The above presented dissertation illustrates both perspectives about the impact of the in the some country, the no shooting increase because many people have guns at home. While it is evident it has some various benefits, although its deleterious effect cannot be ignored.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'upsurged'.
Suggestion: upsurged
...which has always been debatable has now upsurge a lots of a arguments in favor and agai...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...s always been debatable has now upsurge a lots of a arguments in favor and against it,...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...een debatable has now upsurge a lots of a arguments in favor and against it, thus...
^
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a argument' or simply 'arguments'?
Suggestion: a argument; arguments
...een debatable has now upsurge a lots of a arguments in favor and against it, thus it has be...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 383, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...arked controversy over the potential of this trends is an integral part of the socie...
^^^^
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...it is apparent that the downside of the no of the shooting increase because many p...
^^
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...pectives about the impact of the in the some country, the no shooting increase becau...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15120274914 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0191149904 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491408934708 0.580463131201 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 482.4 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 9.0 1.56157635468 576% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8472605709 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.916666667 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.658865665755 0.242375264174 272% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.241356261295 0.0925447433944 261% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.223416429502 0.071462118173 313% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.423585038012 0.151781067708 279% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715146620635 0.0609392437508 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.