In some countries, there have been schemes to encourage older professional people to retrain as school teachers. Do you feel that this is likely to have beneficial effects on education? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience.
In several nations, there has been an increasing tendency in recent years of encouraging older professionals to retain as teachers. This initiative is aimed at addressing the shortage of teachers and improving quality of education. I believe that this can have number of positive consequences on education.
To begin with, the experience and knowledge that older professionals who retain as teachers offer to a classroom is indispensable. They can provide students real-world perspective on subjects, making the curriculum more relevant and engaging for the students. For instance, mechanical engineers may add unique perspective to the classroom by connecting science and math problems with examples from their own experience. This kind of practical knowledge can be crucially important to students and help them to understand the concepts they are learning.
Nevertheless, those who disagree with the notion claim that teaching can be a difficult profession that requires a lot of energy. It is mostly related to the fact that certain individuals may find it challenging if they have worked in a quite office. However, this can be altered by providing individuals with specific training before the get into teaching.
In conclusion, I tend to believe that schemes to encourage older professionals to remain as teaches have several beneficial effects on education. Their wealth of knowledge and experience may improve the intelligence and productivity of our future generation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('quite') instead an adjective, or a noun ('office') instead of another adjective.
...d it challenging if they have worked in a quite office. However, this can be altered by provid...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, nevertheless, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56637168142 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19726320042 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610619469027 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.2171314429 50.4703680194 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.833333333 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190258305118 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682739266677 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597833161536 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116249348335 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382679330231 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.