Some effective people like repetitive routine, such as eating the same food, do you like this way?
Recently, different perspective relating to repetitive routine has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "do people like repetitive routine?". Whereas it is a widely held view that some effective people like eating the same food, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the psychological standpoint, dairy activities are bound up inextricably with mind, which indicates they lead to both leisure activity and old-fashioned activity. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between breakfast time and sleep cycle as well as an exponential increase in individual's performance. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of planning is correlated positively with not only time table but also scheduling.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, youth generation attribute to adventurous sports, in that it would come down to modern lifestyle, agile mind, and jobs. A salient example of such attribution is personal habits, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take social norm for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint ordinary repetitive activities problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to management, powerful thinking, and even triggering mind. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of planning different activities.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that repetitive activities effect on mental health. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, different perspective relating...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the psychological standpoint, dairy...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly time table but also scheduling. Within the realm of society, without the...
^^^^^^^
Line 29, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of planning different activities. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 33, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95714285714 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16591380238 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.714285714286 0.580463131201 123% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5075483664 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.307692308 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172923291803 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486512170806 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995756133066 0.071462118173 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108007847854 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149766546978 0.0609392437508 246% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.