Some environmentalists claim that people who drive cars do not have a right to complain about pollution since cars also pollute. What is your opinion?
Cars have become necessities for the faster and better commute in this fast pace world. But over use of cars have caused air pollution, therefore, some environmentalist believe that people who use car for their comfort should no complain about pollution where as other think it wrong to limit their freedom of speech just because they use cars. This essay will discuss why cars user should be allowed to talk about pollution.
To begin with, pollution has increased rapidly over the years and has caused some irreplaceable damage to our environment. But the industrial revolution is more responsible for the pollution than the use of cars. For example, Nepal is developing country with large number of cars and less industry and has less air pollution compared to the developed countries with large number of industries. Therefore, it would be ignorant to limit the people from their right to speak about pollution just because they use cars.
Apart from that, cars are of the safest, fastest and cheapest means of transportation known to mankind. People will lose their means of commute if they do not use cars just because they contribute to pollution. For instance, in the northern territory of Australia people have to go places where public transportation is not available, so, in such case you people to have a car. In addition, fuel cars will be absolute in coming future as it is starting to be replaced by solar powered cars.
To recapitulate, this essay described why it is not right to restrict people from giving their point of view just because they own a car. Even though car attributes to pollution people of this technological advancement era cannot absolutely disown cars because it is their means of their transportation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...fort should no complain about pollution where as other think it wrong to limit their fre...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01718213058 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7810858775 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515463917526 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 453.6 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.954214133 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.307692308 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286735617805 0.242375264174 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107145915954 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522125238885 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186953790737 0.151781067708 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457513483065 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.