Some organizations integrate employees in decision making process of their goods and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this.
When organizations go for any decision making process, the outcomes of the decisions made can greatly affect both company’s health and its employees. There are several benefits and drawbacks to involving employees in the decision-making process, but I believe the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. This essay will discuss both benefits and drawbacks of integrating employees in the decision making process and thus lead a plausible conclusion.
To commence with, the first and foremost, employees can give many different, unique and best advices and ideas those will help in company’s grow and expand their business. To including employees in decision making also tells them that their opinions matter. For example, IBM always includes employees in their decision making process by conducting surveys and poles and asking for different and unique ideas which made the Watson a successful launch. Therefore, for companies’ growth, it’s really important to have a wide verity of ideas and advices those come from including their employees.
On the flip side, companies that make decisions while keeping their employees in the dark may lose the trust of their employees and there won’t be any transparency at the workplace. There are still some decisions should be made by management as they have defined vision for the company and employees may not have it. For instance, a new study showed that policies related decisions should made by management because employees can come up with policies considering themselves. Thus, by not including employees in the decision making process can bring the transparency issue with employees.
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that the advantages of including employees in the decision making process outweigh the disadvantages. In my opinion, this involvement help companies to strengthen their relationship with employees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... first and foremost, employees can give many different, unique and best advices and ideas thos...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...then their relationship with employees.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, really, so, still, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67474048443 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04642935122 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515570934256 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 484.2 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2603119081 50.4703680194 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.153846154 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.25397266985 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374535763376 0.242375264174 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160790318923 0.0925447433944 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848371264007 0.071462118173 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260074537434 0.151781067708 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722423828658 0.0609392437508 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.