Violence portrayed on TV and in the movies leads to an increase in crime in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. Do you agree or disagree?
Television has become essential part of our lives and society. Violence portrayed on TV and in the movies, leads to an increase in crime in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. I agree with the notion and as we human have tendency to pick up bad things first and try to implement in our lives which results increase in crime rate in society. This essay will discuss that how TV contributes in increase of crimes and the criminals in society and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To commence with, the first and foremost, being human, we have tendency to copy bad things first, instead of good things this applicable in context with TV. Although movies made on violence and crimes main motto behind that to spread awareness about crime, people started picking up the methods and tricks of the violence. That results into increasing crime rate in society. For instance, like movie series Dhoom illustrates how to rob bank and financial institutes with advanced technologies and tricks so people started coping those tricks and implementing which increased the robbery cases in society.
To continue with, as people are blindly follow several celebrities and whatever they endorsed and portrayed in movies and on TV. People think that they are real hero because of that they beat villains and save people and people implement those stunts in their lives which increases violence and fights. For example, in India, teenagers fight cases increased from 10% to 30% in last few years after seeing their favourite actors fighting and becoming cool.
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that undoubtedly TV contributes largely in increase of the crime rates and criminals in society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 8.36945812808 239% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 31.9359605911 160% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11111111111 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54481438359 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545138888889 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 440.1 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7390825344 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.230769231 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 7.25397266985 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 6.9802955665 14% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 2.75862068966 362% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424499924939 0.242375264174 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171334519777 0.0925447433944 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1410766832 0.071462118173 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248688813087 0.151781067708 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156425928631 0.0609392437508 257% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.