Many sports stars earn enormous amounts of money. Some people that this is fair because they are talented. Others believe that a people salary should be based on their contribution to society.
Undoubtedly, many sports stars are exceptionally wealthy and it becomes the controversial topic among people as they don’t much contribute in the society except to entertain people. I believe that although sports person entertains us, they don’t deserve to get a vast amount of salary. This essay will discuss both points in detail.
To commence with, many sports person are talented and entertaining people around the world but that doesn’t make them entitled to an enormous amount of salary. One reason could be because they can play until they are physically fit which can be a very small span of their life as compared to other professions. For instance, like watching Virat Kohli and Dhoni play cricket is make you happy nothing else. Therefore, sports persons get a large amount of salary just for entertaining people which they don’t deserve.
Although sports persons are highly talented and entertaining, they don’t deserve the huge amount as they least contribute in the society. Teachers and nurses contribute more in society’s betterment and they deserve much more salary and respect as they are preparing youth for the nations’ future. For example, in India now the salary of teachers is increased under the new pay laws and it’s somewhat near what they deserve. Thus, teachers and nurses deserve more salaries as their contribution to society in high.
In conclusion, although sports persons are highly talented, it should not be the merit of getting excessively high salaries. In my opinion, other professions which contribute more to society and nations deserve a high rate of payment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...ts in detail. To commence with, many sports person are talented and entertaining pe...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34615384615 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81520596323 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553846153846 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3804681325 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.923076923 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.25397266985 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300812319148 0.242375264174 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107661632971 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553426701028 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176831559856 0.151781067708 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453933308374 0.0609392437508 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.