Violence portrayed on TV and in the movies leads to an increase in crime in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of the violence of movies and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the significance of complex procedure is highly regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that increasing crime in society can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, watching violent movies can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experinece, when I was a university students, I performed an academic experiment which discovered currecnt policies. Thus, The beneficial ramification of social effects and criminal activity apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, the influence of television might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with bad habits. Hence, It is correct to presume the preconcevied notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling argument on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of breaking law far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantage of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint the thorny issues' ptential of implication.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...believe that increasing crime in society can be a plus and I will analyze that th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63559322034 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20176400317 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677966101695 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6811327934 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.909090909 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0968429157386 0.242375264174 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0302530944246 0.0925447433944 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357320871629 0.071462118173 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.049048779529 0.151781067708 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317366638633 0.0609392437508 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.17 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.