Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work, some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience, such as international travel and volunteering. Support with examples or cases.
Recently, the phenomenon of "some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work, some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that volunteering might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that concentrating on work or study by young people can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, concentrating on study or work can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that increasing the life quality and education are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of the study on the life of youths. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both promoting the people's awareness and job opportunities distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of economics science, without the slightest doubt, putting energy in activities designed to broaden the people's experience might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the loss of jobs. Moreover, fundamental aspects of more income can relate to the reality that the demerits of international travel can pertain to the lack of money. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of broadening adults' experiences were correlated positively with occupations, the local authorities would ultimately address adolescences' problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of volunteering.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to support the idea that the merits of concentrating on study or work far outweigh its downsides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...ble ramifications of both promoting the peoples awareness and job opportunities distinc...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32762678196 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616666666667 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.3824665177 50.4703680194 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.636363636 104.977214359 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.449357762614 0.242375264174 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130201354115 0.0925447433944 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141354919433 0.071462118173 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220883266513 0.151781067708 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1591238377 0.0609392437508 261% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.