Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary school to universities, too much time spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Agree or disagree?
Education is a fundamental right of everyone which plays a crucial role in the development of a country. Considering this, many people believe that an extensive amount of time is being spent on theoretical concepts rather than focusing on practical knowledge. I am entirely inclined towards this fact and same will be discussed in following paragraphs before delivering a plausible conclusion.
To commence with, it is evident that the economical growth of a country relies on its literacy rate to a great extent. However, some nations, specifically developing ones, still use orthodox way of teaching in their school and universities which doesn't allow their citizens to explore their intellectual and mental origin. Thus, students of that particular institutes passed out with insufficient working skills which ultimately, makes them less likely to receive job opportunities.
Moreover, many academic organisation these days adopting new methods of teaching. For instance, the concept of smart classes is being adopted by the many institutions to provide an enhanced and lucrative standard of education. In addition, travelling is also introduced by numerous universities to assist their students with a practical experience which consequently, enable them to equipped themselves with any kind of skill.
To recapitulate, this foregoing discussion propounds the view that even though theoretical knowledge favor students with the basic knowledge of anything, yet practical skills also need to be brushed up for the better future career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 42, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...o commence with, it is evident that the economical growth of a country relies on its liter...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ally developing ones, still use orthodox way of teaching in their school and univ...
^^
Line 4, column 248, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... in their school and universities which doesnt allow their citizens to explore their ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd universities which doesnt allow their citizens to explore their intellectual a...
^^
Line 4, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of that particular institutes passed out with insufficient working skills which u...
^^
Line 6, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of education. In addition, travelling is also introduced by numerous universitie...
^^
Line 6, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cation. In addition, travelling is also introduced by numerous universities to a...
^^
Line 6, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch consequently, enable them to equipped themselves with any kind of skill. To...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, for instance, in addition, kind of, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 232.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68103448276 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09659204336 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689655172414 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3096016314 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.8 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3 7.25397266985 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.33497536946 150% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0680409031821 0.242375264174 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0241661602497 0.0925447433944 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309860024625 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0389276807268 0.151781067708 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244742970422 0.0609392437508 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.