Education is a fundamental right of everyone which plays a crucial role in the development of a country. Considering this, many people believe that an extensive amount of time is being spent on theoretical concepts rather than focusing on practical knowledge. I am entirely inclined towards this fact and same will be discussed in following paragraphs before delivering a plausible conclusion.
To commence with, it is evident that the economical growth of a country relies on its literacy rate to a great extent. However, some nations, specifically developing ones, still use orthodox way of teaching in their school and universities which doesn't allow their students to explore their intellectual and mental origin. Thus, students of that particular institutes pass out with insufficient practical skills which ultimately, makes them less likely to receive job opportunities.
However, educational organisation need to emphasize both theoretical and practical knowledge equally to ensure the balanced education system because practical experience enables pupils to practice their facts learned from theories and also provide a platform where they can evaluate their performance in real time.
To recapitulate, this foregoing discussion propounds the view that even though theoretical knowledge favor students with the basic knowledge of anything, yet practical skills also need to be brushed up for the better future career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 42, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...o commence with, it is evident that the economical growth of a country relies on its liter...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ally developing ones, still use orthodox way of teaching in their school and univ...
^^
Line 4, column 248, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... in their school and universities which doesnt allow their students to explore their i...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of that particular institutes pass out with insufficient practical skills which...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, thus, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 213.0 242.827586207 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75117370892 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03030459324 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.704225352113 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6551724138 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.1704495918 50.4703680194 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.125 104.977214359 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127438713067 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04509320526 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490100361529 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0708419802989 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475972959856 0.0609392437508 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.