Some people think that the design of buildings has affect, either positively or negatively, on where people work and live. To what extent you agree or disagree.
The importance of the design of the building, which was always debatable, has more become more controversial. The substance influence of the design of buildings has sparked controversy over the potential impact of the whole society in recent years. It can be agreed that the design of the building plays a vital role, although it has some drawbacks. This essay will elaborate on how the design of buildings provides a safe environment for people and how poor sound insulation affects people’s mood, and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerable reasons why the design of buildings has a positive effect on people, but the most conspicuous one stems is that provides a safe environment for people. As an illustration, research has invariably revealed that the new design of buildings in Japan has dramatically decreased four times for burglary rate compared with traditional buildings after the intelligent lock has installed to people’s houses. Therefore, the design of buildings has a positive effect on the whole society.
Nevertheless, some people adopt to an opposing view to believe that the design of buildings has a negative impact as there are innumerable reasons for that but the most salient one is that its poor sound insulation. For instance, John’s father got insomnia recently because he moved to a new designer apartment with poor sound insulation, which directly causes his father can’t fall asleep at night. Thus, the design of buildings will bring a negative effect on people.
In conclusion, from what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of the design of buildings for people is prominent, although the poor sound insulation should be well handled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... positive effect on the whole society. Nevertheless, some people adopt to an op...
^^^
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
... society. Nevertheless, some people adopt to an opposing view to believe that the de...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2304964539 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93368732174 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514184397163 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.9 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.4811900253 50.4703680194 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.090909091 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.9669160288 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240793271272 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104638763239 0.0925447433944 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481560652101 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157779800213 0.151781067708 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384527927755 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.