Some people think that keeping pets is good for children. While other think it is dangerous and unhealthy. which opinion do you agree with? discuss both options and give example.
The importance of the people think that keeping pets is good for children, which has always been debatable has now upsurge a lots of arguments in favor and against it, thus it has become even more controversial. The substantial influence of imitating celebrities has sparked controversy over the potential of this rends in an integral part of the society in recent years. It can be agreed that the upside of imitating celebrities are instruments indeed, however it has some various drawbacks as well. This essay will be elaborate on both assertions and provide the well-weighted conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why the keeping pets is good for children is unreservedly salient, but the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that people think dangerous and unhealthy for children. Therefore, it is vital time to appreciate both the significance of the keeping the pets is god for children for the overall amelioration of society.
However, it some people who choose think differently and hold an opposing viewpoint. Which can certainly overwhelm substantial influence on the people think it is dangerous and unhealthy for children? Nevertheless, the contradiction is rooted in the fact that pets are very harmful disease effect on small children. Hence, it is apparent that the downside of the keeping pets is very good for children cannot be ignored.
The above-presented dissertation illustrates both perspectives about the impact of the keeping pets is good for children. While it is evident, it has various benefits, although it deleterious effect cannot be ignored.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'upsurged'.
Suggestion: upsurged
...which has always been debatable has now upsurge a lots of arguments in favor and agains...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...s always been debatable has now upsurge a lots of arguments in favor and against it, t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to think'
Suggestion: to think
...y. However, it some people who choose think differently and hold an opposing viewpo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28235294118 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06266726822 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521568627451 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 411.3 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1936483777 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.25 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374353459502 0.242375264174 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134740226744 0.0925447433944 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907017315195 0.071462118173 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233910072151 0.151781067708 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655373780334 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.