Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options and give examples
Recently, children's health regarding to keeping pets has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the Pros and Cons of keeping pets?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is highly dangerous for children's health, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the health standpoint, keeping pets are bound up inextricably with caring, which indicates they lead to both cost and time. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between pet owners and animal's clinics as well as an exponential increase in healthy food. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of domestic animals is correlated positively with not only animal husbandry but also animal protection law.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, modern life style attribute to long working hours, in that it would come down to anxiety, depression, and more stress. A salient example of such attribution is playing, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take leisure time for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint animal's disease problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to pet lovers, vaccination, and even animal's doctor. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of nursery and caring.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that more caring must be into taken to account. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 409, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...ht have had the opportunity to pinpoint animals disease problems. Likewise, hardly had ...
^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, regarding, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48771929825 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.941527211 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.687719298246 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.57948224 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.307692308 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147424291898 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453249344442 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509923313573 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0844773117093 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05196845578 0.0609392437508 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.