Some people suggest that each family should have one car not encourage alternative vehicle.give your opinion.
The importance of some people suggest that each family should have one car not encourage alternative vehicle has always debatable has now upsurged a lots of argument in favor and against it. Thus it has become even more controversial. The substantial influence of some people suggest that each family should have one car not encourage alternative vehicle has always debatable has sparked the controversy over the potential of this trends in an integral part of the society in the recent years. It can be agreed that upside of some people suggest that each family should have one car not encourage alternative vehicle has always debatable is instruments indeed, however it has some various drawback as well. This easy will be elaborate both assertion and will provide to a well-weighted conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons. Why is now days pollution in increase day by day government should be banned the heavy vehicle is unreservedly salient, but the most conspicuous one lies fact that some people suggest that each family have one car not encourage alternative vehicle has always debatable for instance. Therefore, it is clearly vital time for people appreciate the significance of The government should be provide the city bus in different city for the overall amelioration of society
The above presented dissertation illustrate both perspective about the impact of some people suggest that each family should have one car encourage alternative vehicle has always debatable. While it is evident that it has some various benefits, although its deleterious effects cannot be ignored and have to be addressed and well balanced against its merits
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...e has always debatable has now upsurged a lots of argument in favor and against it. Th...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ts of argument in favor and against it. Thus it has become even more controversial. ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 427, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...d the controversy over the potential of this trends in an integral part of the socie...
^^^^
Line 2, column 3, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ovide to a well-weighted conclusion. At the outset, there are numerous reasons. ...
^^
Line 2, column 55, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
... there are numerous reasons. Why is now days pollution in increase day by day govern...
^^^^
Line 2, column 430, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provided'?
Suggestion: provided
...ignificance of The government should be provide the city bus in different city for the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 508, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for the overall amelioration of society The above presented dissertation illustr...
^^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t it has some various benefits, although its deleterious effects cannot be ignore...
^^
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed and well balanced against its merits
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25468164794 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81754999973 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 139.433497537 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475655430712 0.580463131201 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 464.4 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.658779937 50.4703680194 209% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 155.888888889 104.977214359 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 20.9669160288 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 5.33497536946 169% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.501992947389 0.242375264174 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.230464867778 0.0925447433944 249% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.198089811046 0.071462118173 277% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.376351294665 0.151781067708 248% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0926643693719 0.0609392437508 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.