Some people think that keeping pets is good for children. While others think it is dangerous and unhealthy.Which opinion do you agree with? discuss both options and give example
The importance of keeping pets is good for children, which has always been debatable has now upsurge a lots of arguments in favor and against it, thus it has become even more controversial. The substantial influence of imitating celebrities has sparked controversy over the potential of this trends is an integral part of the society. In recent years, It can be agreed that the upside of imitating celebrates are instruments indeed. However it has some various drawbacks as well. This essay will be elaborate on both assertions and provide well-weight conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why the people thinks that keeping pets is good for children is unreservedly salient. But the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that the children play with pets in the ground and enjoy lot. Therefore, it is a vital time to appreciate both the significance of the keeping pets is good for children for the amelioration of society.
However, it has some people choose to think different and hold an opposing viewpoint. Which can certainly overwhelm substantial influence on the other people thinks pets are dangerous and unhealthy for children? Nevertheless, the contradiction is rooted. In the fact that pets hairs and mouth vires are spread the bacteria and many harmful disease. It is very harmful for children. Hence, it is apparent that the downside of the people thinks it is dangerous and unhealthy for children cannot be ignored.
The above presented dissertation illustrates both perspectives about the impact of the people think that keeping pets is good for children. While others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. While it is evident it has various benefits, although its deleterious effect cannot be ignored.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'upsurged'.
Suggestion: upsurged
...which has always been debatable has now upsurge a lots of arguments in favor and agains...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...s always been debatable has now upsurge a lots of arguments in favor and against it, t...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...arked controversy over the potential of this trends is an integral part of the socie...
^^^^
Line 1, column 434, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ting celebrates are instruments indeed. However it has some various drawbacks as well. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 10.5418719212 209% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18085106383 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90487874222 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517730496454 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.9 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2142683661 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9411764706 104.977214359 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 20.9669160288 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 7.25397266985 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445412900882 0.242375264174 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141121219702 0.0925447433944 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122274683647 0.071462118173 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278572033773 0.151781067708 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0945212662956 0.0609392437508 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.