There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. Do you agree that the problem outweigh the benefits of mobiles phones?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that there are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that there are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones can not only contribute to mobile phone is very dangerous for our eyes and also harmful for birds and animals, but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is only likelt to help one thrive and excel in varied areas, Besides, only when one follows such a system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication and perseverance. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of there are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones.
In view of arguments outlined above, one can concluded that the benefits of there are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones are indeed too great to ignore
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...edical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. There is ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9724137931 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74748614968 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 475.2 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.1766592069 50.4703680194 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.2 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 20.9669160288 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.25397266985 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390832188405 0.242375264174 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171358430389 0.0925447433944 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.197549360707 0.071462118173 276% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277326671464 0.151781067708 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821119640598 0.0609392437508 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.1260098522 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.