Some people think law changes human behavior. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of XYZ and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of its importance is highly bebeficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a susbtantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that XYZ can be plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
First and the foremost, XYZ can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of xyz, as well as xyz which are inextricably bound up. According to my own experiment, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered xyz. Thus, beneficial ramifications of xyz can be seen.
On the flip side, XYZ might increase consequences of xyz. Moreover, fundamental aspects of xyz would relate to this reality that the demerits of being xyz pertain to xyz. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has aserted that downside of xyz is correlated negatively with xyz. Hence, it is correct to presume preconceived notion adverse effect on human's life.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that merits of xyz outweigh its demerits. Thus, the positive aspects of XYZ should be considered.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate to this reality that the demerits of being xyz pertain to xyz. As a tangible ...
^^
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...e preconceived notion adverse effect on humans life. To conclude, while there are c...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1117.0 1207.87684729 92% => OK
No of words: 213.0 242.827586207 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2441314554 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07131255855 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615023474178 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4430815763 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0833333333 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0229985507147 0.242375264174 9% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.010103849756 0.0925447433944 11% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0182030232358 0.071462118173 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0133260597358 0.151781067708 9% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144913403241 0.0609392437508 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.