people emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new roads for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of building an advanced transport system and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of strong transport system has become a need of the system, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by enormous individuals. I am inclined to believe that building an advanced transport system as an alternative to new roads can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
At the outset, building new roads is not sufficient for a crowd as it makes cities more crowded. Also, the crowded roads are unsafe to travel and difficult to monitor for traffic rules violations. Thus, a mankind easily breaks the rules and try to skip from wrongdoing which further results in an accident and run cases. For example, drivers hit the vehicles and run away without get catches by traffic police and this gradually becomes their habits.
On the flip side, an advanced transport system should be built for daily commute as the population in metro cities is significantly growing year by year. Moreover, an advance transport will systematically control the crowd and provide instructions to be followed in order to easily travel which in result drastically detriment the accident rate and improve the human life. For example, having a strong transport system can find the person who breaks any transport rules. Thus, this practice significantly eradicates their bad habits. Thus people going to take the system and its rules sincerely and immensely improve their lifestyle.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that merits of an advanced transport system and its features outweigh over building new roads. Thus, the benefits of such system on society should be considered.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77283715981 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558219178082 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0913471947 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 7.25397266985 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307910485817 0.242375264174 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106944233579 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681851640508 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192283907444 0.151781067708 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468113858558 0.0609392437508 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.