Any recent inventions that you think proved beneficial or detrimental to society.
Science has revolutionized in each and every field. Almost every day we come to know about new technologies invented across the globe. Hence, we have become dependent on these technologies. Recently various inventions have been done and one of them is the smartphone. It has enormous benefits to the society. However, it has some detrimental impact on the human beings too. In this essay, I will explain both the positive and nefarious side.
First and foremost, technologies have become part of everybody's life. The Smartphone is one of them which has the ability to install myriad apps which have fortified human's life like video calling, booking restaurants or cab etc. Nowadays the prominent advantage of a smartphone is being used as an indispensable tool for information. Which further, helps in gaining knowledge and make life easier.
Secondly, it has enormous features like camera, calculator, torch etc to assists the human being in various tasks and fortified their life with ease and comfort.
On the flip side, emission of radiation from a smartphone has an adverse impact on a human being. And, their easy and handy access has detrimental effects on the society. For example, the various apps like Whatsapp, Instagram has diminished the formal communication practices like writing a letter, face to face communication etc.
Overall smartphone has various problems but their benefits outweigh its disadvantages. Thus, devices like a smartphone to be used with extra care to avoid the adverse effects on health.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30327868852 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88661945696 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594262295082 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8575298772 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.1176470588 104.977214359 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3529411765 20.9669160288 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 7.25397266985 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0732039843934 0.242375264174 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0288412041659 0.0925447433944 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481068101513 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.036665208738 0.151781067708 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504854421417 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 53.1260098522 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.94827586207 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.